|
WHAT
IS HYPODOWN?
Hypodown is
a natural hypoallergenic combination of white goose down and Syriaca.
Asclepias Syriaca, or Syriaca, is also known as milkweed. Syriaca
grows abundantly in the United States and is now cultivated on Nebraska
farms. The fall harvest reaps soft and silky clusters from the plants
pod. The Hypodown naturally traps and suppresses the dust and dander
that people with allergies react to in traditional down products.
This combination makes Hypodown the only natural, hypoallergenic
down product in the bedding industry. Hypodown is warmer, more breathable,
and more durable than down alone.
Top
HOW
TO CHOOSE A COMFORTER
We have been
finding out recently that not all comforters are created equal.
Intuitively, I have always known that but the criteria for distinguishing
between them were more complicated than I realized. Here are the
different variables and I have tried to keep it simple for you.
- Fill Power
In layman's terms this means how fluffy/puffy is the fill. Fluffy
down occupies more space. A higher number on the 600-800 scale
means it is fluffier. Higher fill power means it also lasts longer.
- Thread
Count/Barrier Weave fabric
The thread count is the number of threads that are contained in
one square inch of fabric. Higher thread counts in a fabric mean
it is lighter and softer. The tightness of the weave also prevents
leakage of the fill to the outside air. The lightness also helps
the fill to " loft"- puff up in layman's terms. Downproofness
is measure in millimeters .Lower numbers mean better down proofing.
The industry standard in '10'.An air porosity test[how much air
can pass through a fabric] is a measure of "downproofness". Higher
thread counts are obviously better. In other words- no little
feathers poking through the fabric.
- Cleanliness
There are acceptable government standards for the cleanliness
of feathers and down. This cleanliness is a primary variable in
determining the hypoallergenic nature of some down comforters.
Some comforter fills are washed as many as fifteen times to get
rid of dust, dirt and organic matter. There are two "cleanliness"
tests in the industry. a. A Oxygen test determines the amount
of organic matter left in the material being tested. The industry
acceptable standard is 10.Better products have lower numbers than
that. b. Turbidity tests. Turbidity is a measure of suspended
solids, dust, dirt etc suspended in the material. The scale goes
from about 60[unwashed feathers ]to 550 best.
- Type of
Down
These are in order of quality. Please note that in some comforters
labeled" pure down" or 100% down are not pure , as some feathers
remain in the fill. As long as the comforter is 75% down it can
be labeled 100% in many state's [ugh! We need a new label law
here]
- Duck
feather
- Duck
feather and Down
- Goose
feather and Down
- Goose
down
- Hungarian
DownSiberian
Down
- Weight
A comforter
can be made warmer in two ways. Fill power and weight. Clearly
the aim is to get the maximum warmth at the lightest weight. To
get this you would choose a higher fill power number. Feathers
are a great deal less warm than high grade down. Once you have
selected the fillpower then add weight for extra warmth
- Construction
a. Sewing Quality. Better sewing means more durability, less tendency
for sewing to break. Comforters are generally sewn through or
baffled. The baffling is an internal fabric wall which allows
the fill to "loft" more. It also adds strength to the comforter.
Comforters which are sewn through are generally better for lighter
weight comforters only. http://www.allergybuyersclubshopping.com/comforters.html
Top
HOW
TO TEST WHETHER YOUR PILLOW NEEDS REPLACING
I found some
information the other day about how to test whether your pillow
needs replacing. Here is the essence of the advice
- For all natural pillows:
Fold the pillow
in half [a king size pillow in thirds] then release it. A "good
pillow" will release and bounce back into shape.
- For all
synthetic pillows:
Follow
directions as above but put a 10 ounce weight on top. A clean
tennis shoe is about the right weight. Then take the shoe off
the pillow. If the pillow is OK it will release.
Top
IS
WOMENS LIB THE CAUSE OF THE INCREASE IN ALLERGIES?
By
Tom Ogren
Editor's
Note: When Tom sent me this it really made me chuckle in a black
humored kind of way!
Now, this is
one of my favorites! My brother-in-law, a college professor, was
seeing a famous allergist, who I'll not name. He tried to tell the
allergist all about my book, Allergy-Free Gardening. The allergist
dismissed it all as unimportant and then told him, "You want to
know why there's so much allergy nowadays?" My brother-in-law said
that, yes, he certainly did want to know. "Women's Lib," said the
learned doctor. "Women used to stay home where they belonged and
they took care of the kids and kept their houses neat and clean.
Now, well,
now they all have to have jobs, just like the men, and who's taking
care of the house? Nobody! That's why there's so much allergy now.
Their houses are filthy and covered with dust."
My brother-in-law
wasn't quite sure what to make of that. I have an answer for that
doctor. An increase in house dust isn't driving the allergy rates
sky-high. Not even close. What's gone up is the amount of pollen
in our cities. In some areas, Tucson, Arizona, for example, there
is actually ten times more pollen in the air there now than there
was just thirty years ago! And I can document that.
It isn't just
Arizona either. In city after city, north and south, all around
the civilized world, everywhere that modern, low-litter, litter-free,
seedless, male landscaping has become popular, pollen rates are
up. Even though in many cities there is now less total green matter
than in the past, there is still more pollen than ever. And more
allergy, too.
Not long ago
I was out in my own neighborhood, camera in hand, looking for some
choice high-allergy landscapes to photograph. I didn't have to go
far. I was standing, carefully, on the public sidewalk, taking a
close-up shot of some Groundsel bush ( Baccharis sp.) used as a
ground cover in this front yard. An older gentleman came out of
the house, looked at me and asked, "Now, what in the world could
be worth photographing in my yard?" "I'm an allergy researcher,
Sir," I said. "Yeah?" he asked. "Some problem here?" "This ground
cover is all male," I said. "All-male, and all of it rather closely
related to ragweed." "Humm," he said. "And that big row of junipers
you've got there," I said, pointing to the side of his yard, "looks
like every one of them is a male, too. That ash tree of yours, notice
how it doesn't have any seeds?" "Yeah?" "It's a male tree. Actually,
your entire yard, everything in it except that climbing rose bush
on the front porch, all of it could have been designed to cause
allergies. Anybody here have allergies?" "Sure," he said, "my wife.
She's got terrible allergies."
I looked at
the yard full of male ground cover, all of it in full bloom. "Well,"
I said, "I'd be willing to bet she's having allergies right now."
"Yep," he said, "she certainly is."
Now, I didn't
even bother to ask him if his wife kept their house spotless and
dust-free. It was a nice house, in an expensive neighborhood, and
somehow I seriously doubted, that his wife's allergies were being
caused by Women's Lib.
More
about Tom
Top
THE
SEVEN SINS OF AIR FILTER MANUFACTURERS
by Frank Hames, President - IQAir, North America
Editors note:
I thought this article highly educational. It was printed in Indoor
Air Connections recently.
With estimated
sales of over 4 million units in 1999 in the United States, room
air purifiers have become standard appliances in many households
and offices. Manufacturers of room air purifiers must strive - harder
than anyone else in the air purification industry - to provide low
cost products to their consumers. This has resulted in air cleaners with HEPA technology selling for as little as $80.00. While making
air cleaning technology affordable is a commendable goal; misleading
marketing statements and questionable air cleaning performance have
many users disappointed.
This article
attempts to draw attention to a number of deceptive marketing practices,
that air purifier manufacturers use, which are detrimental to the
credibility of the air cleaning industry as a whole.
Since the science
of air cleaning is a complex one, finding one's way through the
maze of unsubstantiated claims and misinformation is a difficult
task even for the most alert and critical consumer. Seven common
industry practices in particular continue to confuse consumers and
air cleaning professionals.
1. Theoretical
HEPA Efficiency vs. Actual System Efficiency
Due to the
high efficiency, reliability and proven track-record, HEPA technology
has become the industry standard for particulate filtration in critical
environments, such as semi-conductor cleanrooms and hospital operating
rooms. Recognizing the great marketing potential of the term "HEPA",
many manufacturers are using it to project a high- performance image
onto their room air purifiers. What most HEPA-based air purifiers
manufacturers conveniently omit to tell the consumer, is that their
air purifiers provide nowhere near the performance level of professional
HEPA filter systems used in hospitals and cleanrooms.
Often consumers
are misled about an air purifier's efficiency in removing pollutants.
Statements like "effectively removes 99% of all airborne allergens"
or "efficiently scrubs the room free of air pollutants", lead consumers
to believe that these air purifiers remove virtually all of the
impurities from the air in a normal indoor environment.
Claims about
HEPA-based air purifiers often state 99.97% filtration efficiency.
In most cases, this is also not true. The actual efficiency, for
particles of 0.3 microns or larger, of many HEPA-based air purifiers
sold today is below 80%. The "99.97%" refers to, in most cases,
the theoretical efficiency rating of the filter paper that is used
in the air cleaning device at 0.3 microns or larger.
The performance
gap between HEPA-based room air purifiers and professional HEPA
filter systems is mainly due to cutting corners in mass-production
and profit maximization. There are a number of reasons why most
HEPA-based room air purifiers do not achieve actual HEPA performance:
1. HEPA-rated
filter media is not used. 2. The HEPA filter media gets damaged
during the pleating process (HEPA media breaks easily). 3. There
is leakage between the pleated HEPA filter pack and the filter frame.
4. There is leakage between the HEPA filter frame and the air purifier
housing.
Only very few
manufacturers state the actual overall efficiency of their device,
and even fewer guarantee and certify their air purifiers.
2. Overstating
Actual Air Delivery Rates Even the most efficient room air purifier
in the world would not impact a room's air quality level, if it
were not able to pass enough air through its filters. The amount
of air that an air purifier is able to process (air flow rate) is
usually expressed in cubic feet per minute (cfm). Consumers are
often misled by exaggerated or false claims by manufacturers regarding
air flow rates.
One common
trade practice is to state the free-flow air handling capacity of
the fan motor (i.e. without filters installed), rather than the
actual air flow rate (i.e. with all filters installed).
Many manufacturers
don't even make this vital air purifier statistic available to consumers.
Instead, many state a suitable room size, without mentioning how
many air changes per hour the air purifier would manage to produce
in that size room.
Only very few
manufacturers state the actual airflow rate of their device (with
all filters installed), and even fewer guarantee and certify their
air purifier's air flow rate.
3. ULPA is
NOT Better than HEPA In an effort to differentiate air purifiers
from the mass of HEPA air purifiers on the market, some manufacturers
have introduced air purifiers, which supposedly use ULPA technology.
ULPA stands for Ultra Low Penetration Air and is used in modern
cleanrooms. The difference between HEPA and ULPA is the efficiency
rating of the filter media. Typical HEPA filter media has an efficiency
of 99.97% at 0.3 microns, whereas ULPA media has an efficiency rating
in excess of 99.999% at 0.12 microns.
Stressing the
higher efficiency at smaller particle size, manufacturers of ULPA-based
air purifiers claim that these devices are superior to HEPA-based
air purifiers. Unfortunately, this is a perfect example where the
search for a better sales pitch has resulted in an inferior product,
since the reverse tends to be the case. All things being equal,
an air purifier that uses ULPA filter media will be less effective
in reducing the particle concentration in a typical room, than the
same air purifier equipped with HEPA filter media. And as with many
HEPA-based air purifiers, many ULPA-based air purifiers come nowhere
close to actually delivering 99.999% particle-free air.
While ULPA
filter media has the potential to remove more particles than HEPA
filter media, that advantage is lost in room air purifiers, due
to the reduction of air flow caused by the denser ULPA filter media.
ULPA filter media typically allow 20-50% less air to pass than HEPA
filter media, resulting in fewer air changes per hour in a given
room.
4. Ineffective
Gas Phase Filtration In many cases room air purifiers are purchased
to deal with gaseous contaminants and odors. So it comes as no surprise
that most manufacturers claim to use some technology to reduce gases
and odors.
The most common
technology adopted by air purifier manufacturers for the removal
of gaseous pollutants is activated carbon. While activated carbon
in its granular form is unquestionably effective for the removal
of many gaseous contaminants, most room air purifiers on the market
today use carbon fiber pads, which are only impregnated with activated
carbon dust. These filter pads contain only a few ounces of actual
activated carbon and as a result, are essentially ineffective for
the removal of gases and odors.
Some manufacturers
claim that their activated carbon filter eliminates all gaseous
pollutants and odors, a feat that is scientifically impossible.
Specific gaseous contaminants need specific gas phase filtration
technology. Activated carbon does not efficiently adsorb low molecular
weight gases. For this reason, special sorbents are needed to effectively
deal with pollutants, such as formaldehyde, hydrogen sulfide and
ammonia.
Many room air
purifiers that use granular activated carbon also use zeolite. Zeolite
is a natural mineral, whose pore structure is supposed to be better
suited for the removal for gaseous compounds like formaldehyde and
ammonia. In fact, there is no reliable scientific evidence to show
that zeolite is able to remove any gaseous compound better than
specialty impregnated carbons or impregnated alumina. So why is
Zeolite used? Zeolite is an inexpensive "filler" that is less expensive
than activated carbon. Secondly, the concept of using two different
substances to control gases and odors sounds quite promising to
the unsuspecting customer.
5. Sacrificing
Long-Term Performance While most tests and evaluations of air purifiers
assess only air purifier performance during its first few hours
of usage, the real test for air cleaning effectiveness is long term
performance. Unfortunately, most manufacturers cut costs on features
that would enhance long-term performance.
One standard
industry practice is the use of ineffective pre- filtration. In
HEPA based air purifiers, it causes the HEPA filter to become clogged
at a rapid rate. This in turn reduces the air flow rate, thus resulting
in fewer air changes per hour in a given room. This is a particularly
serious issue, since some manufacturers inform their consumers that
their HEPA filters will only need replacing every 3 to 5 years.
Insufficient
pre-filtration, also, causes air purifiers with substantial granular
activated carbon filters to quickly lose their gas phase adsorption
potential. Dust particles - that should be trapped by pre-filtration
- clog the miniscule pores of the activated carbon, and destroy
its holding capacity to adsorb gases.
Another reason
for poor long term performance of air purifiers is that some air
cleaning technologies suffer drastic reductions in air cleaning
efficiency without regular maintenance or frequent filter change.
Air purifiers
with electrostatic precipitator technology experience drastic efficiency
reductions as the collector plates become covered with particles.
Air purifiers that use electrostatically charged fibers (electrete)
also rapidly lose filter efficiency with particulate loading, especially
in the presence of tobacco smoke.
6. Frequent
and Expensive Filter Replacement While the initial purchase cost
for many room air purifiers is relatively low, the cost of replacement
filters can be substantial. Here are some reasons why many air cleaners
require frequent and expensive filter replacement:
· Lack of effective
pre-filters that protect activated carbon and HEPA filters from
premature clogging. · Use of small filter cartridges with low holding
capacity for pollutants. · Filter replacement instructions that
base filter replacement intervals on time passed (e.g. every 6 months)
rather than actual usage and degree of air pollution. · Combining
several different filter stages in one filter cartridge, thus forcing
the user to replace all filters at once, even if only one filter
stage is used up.
7. Trying to
be All Things to All People While many air purifier manufacturers
offer several models, these models often vary only in size, rather
than air cleaning technology. And since manufacturers like to have
their product appeal to as many potential customers as possible,
they sell one and the same unit as the ideal solution for pet allergens,
pollen, mold spores, microorganisms, tobacco smoke, odors, traffic
fumes and chemicals, etc. In fact, some manufacturers claim that
by virtue of using a multitude of filter stages their air purifier
is more effective. Unfortunately, the effectiveness of the air purifier
suffers, because more filter stages mean higher air resistance and
lower air delivery. Air purifiers that only contain filter stages
matched to the user's requirements, offer superior filtration efficiency
and air flow.,
Conclusion
Industry organizations, like AHAM, have set out to establish some
reference point for air purifier performance, they have not succeeded
to make comparison shopping for air purifiers a simple task. AHAM's
testing protocols do not evaluate actual particle retention, gas
phase filtration or long-term performance of air purifiers.
So what are
the lessons when evaluating air purifiers? Don't believe every claim
made by manufacturers. Realize that a $80 air purifier will have
serious limitations. Ask manufacturers to substantiate their claims
with independent evidence. Check the underlying technology and investigate
whether it has been properly implemented. Use tools that allow objective
evaluation of air cleaning performance, such as laser particle counters,
to check manufacturer's particulate efficiency claims and evaluate
actual particle reduction.
Misleading
claims regarding air purifiers and air filters have in the past
led to decisions and orders of the Federal Trade Commission against
manufacturers, and are likely to do so in the future unless manufacturers
practice better self-restraint and self-regulation. Participating
in sound business practices and making scientifically proven claims
will restore lost faith in room air purifiers, allowing consumers
to make informed purchase decisions - based not only on price but,
also, on actual performance.
http://www.allergybuyersclubshopping.com/iqair.html http://www.allergybuyersclubshopping.com/iqairgcseries.html
Top
Ask
Annie November 15th, 2000
- How
to clean your oven for Turkey Day
- The
Right Way to Use Vinegar for Cleaning the Windows
- Sink and Tub Scrub
- What is Washing Soda?
- Root Growth Aid for Cuttings
- Emollient Honey Bath
Cleaning
the Oven for the Thanksgiving Turkey
Q: How can I clean the oven for Thanksgiving without using
conventional oven cleaner? I never seem to be able to rinse the
oven cleaner out of the oven enough, and the taste of it gets into
the turkey! -Nancy P, ME
A: Mmmm.
Yum. Roast Turkey a la Oven Cleaner. I remember that taste from
a past time, and I agree that it does seem almost impossible to
rinse the cleanser out enough so that it doesn't flavor whatever
one is cooking.
Most people
can hardly believe that all I use for cleaning the oven is baking
soda and water, and that the project requires no scrubbing. I suppose
we have all been so brainwashed by household products companies
that we mistakenly believe we require powerful chemicals for cleaning
in particular. But most people don't know that simple household
minerals such as baking soda can clean like magic. The key is using
enough of the mineral.
To clean my
oven, I sprinkle baking soda all over the bottom until it is covered
completely with about 1/4 of an inch of baking soda. Then, using
a clean spray bottle, I spray the baking soda with water until the
baking soda is thoroughly damp but not flooded. After that, this
lazy cleaner goes off and does other things. When I think of it,
I dampen the baking soda again if it is drying out. Before I go
to bed, I do that again. When I wake up in the morning, the baking
soda can effortlessly be scooped out of the oven with a sponge,
bringing all the grime with it. That's it! The only downside is
only that the baking soda takes rinsing to get out the white residue,
but it sure beats Turkey a La Oven cleaner because there are no
fumes!
The
Right Way to Use Vinegar for Cleaning the Windows
Q: I can't seem to clean the windows with vinegar without
streaks. Any suggestions? -Pat B., NY
A: Oddly
enough, it was the task of cleaning the windows that turned a huge
number of well-intentioned, environmentally friendly consumers away
from nontoxic cleaning using simple ingredients found in most kitchen
cupboards. Around Earth Day 1990, every newspaper in the country
(or so it seemed), offered tips for cleaning in ways that didn't
harm the planet, and the recommendation for windows was almost always
to clean them with nothing but vinegar and water. People by the
thousands tried this, and many swore off cleaning with homemade
products for good because the formula left streaks on their windows.
(I wish I had $1 for every time someone has said to me, "Well, I
tried nontoxic cleaning and it didn't work. I used vinegar for the
windows... ." )
The problem
was that the commercial window cleaner used before the switch to
vinegar left a very fine wax residue, the vinegar alone wasn't enough
to remove it, and the result was streaky windows. If instead, everyone
had added a dab of liquid dish soap to the vinegar and water, the
wax would easily have been removed and the windows would have been
cleaned perfectly! My favorite recipe is to combine 2 cups of water,
1/4 cup of white distilled vinegar, and up to 1/2 teaspoon of liquid
soap or detergent in a spray bottle. That's all there is to it.
(Make sure to label the bottle and keep it out of the reach of children.)
Sink
and Tub Scrub
Q: I remember seeing somewhere a simple way to clean stainless
steel sinks, counters, and bathtubs. Can you help me with this?
Thanks. - Sam L., NM
A: You've
just asked me for my favorite recipe for a homemade soft scrubber.
Place about 1/4 cup of baking soda in a bowl, and stir in enough
liquid detergent (a brand without dyes and synthetic fragrance -
check out the health food store) to make a texture like frosting.
Scoop on a sponge and scrub the sink or countertop.
What
is Washing Soda?
Q: I notice that you ask for washing soda in a lot of your
cleaning recipes. What is it and where can I find it? -Kathy G.,
CO
A: It
wasn't until I discovered washing soda as a heavy-duty cleanser
that I felt I could clean everything in the house using less toxic
ingredients. I stumbled upon it because I needed to peel old wax
off a floor. Washing soda worked for this, as it did for cleaning
up engine oil, and other tough materials that people generally use
solvents for. Washing soda--sodium carbonate-is in the same family
as baking soda, it has just been processed differently. It is much
more caustic/alkaline, with a pH of 11, and while it doesn't give
off harmful fumes, you do need to wear gloves. It is found in the
laundry section of most supermarkets.
Root
Growth Aid for Cuttings
Q: I have a lot of relatives who visit for Thanksgiving,
and they all love my houseplants and want cuttings. Do you have
any suggestions for how to help nourish the cuttings for quick root
growth? --Carolyn K., WA
A: Canadian
research has demonstrated that honey is more effective for promoting
root growth than the commonly used commercial chemical for this
purpose. Try this recipe:
1/4 cup honey
3/4 cup boiling
water
Combine boiling water and honey in a mason jar to blend the honey
into the water. Cool. Place the cuttings in this solution for
one to two days.
Emollient
Honey Bath
Q: My skin is really dry, especially in the winter, and while
I love to take baths, I find they are very drying. What do you suggest
I add to the tub? -Gloria, VT
A: One
of the first things to do is to find the right vegetable or nut
oil that works for your skin. Try out three or four; you will instantly
feel which ones are best for you. For my forty-something skin I
found apricot kernel oil to be the most soothing and emollient.
Great oils for dry skin include apricot kernel oil, avocado oil
(this oil is very lush and rich, especially good for old, dry skin,
but a little goes a long way), almond, and jojoba (this is actually
a liquid wax).
Basic Emollient
Bath Recipe
All of the ingredients asked for in this recipe are found in
most health food stores.
1 to 2 ounces apricot kernel, avocado, or flax seed oil
1 ounce pure vegetable glycerin
2 ounces aloe Vera gel
A few drops pure essential oil of choice.
Add the ingredients
to the tub while it is filling. Makes about 1/4 cup, enough for
1 bath.
Basic Honey
Bath Recipe
Herbalists have touted honey for centuries because it
helps skin retain moisture and is thereby rejuvenating and softening.
2 tablespoons honey
1 cup very hot water
A few drops pure essential oil, if desired
Dissolve the
honey in the water. Add essential oil, if using.
Pour the mixture into the bath water.
Makes 1 cup, enough for one bath.
Top
Happy
Thanksgiving!
Regards,
Mercia Tapping,
President
Allergy Consumer Review: Thanksgiving 2000
Allergy Consumer Review - Issue #14
|